[ Named people, not a resource pool ]
Full-time developers who work on your project, join your standups and answer to your board — from a Jaipur studio that has been building since 2012. You meet them before you commit, and the person you interviewed is the person who does the work.
Full-time developers who work on your project, join your standups and answer to your board — from a Jaipur studio that has been building since 2012. You meet them before you commit, and the person you interviewed is the person who does the work.
Tell us what the first month has to produceA technical call with the actual developer before anything is signed. No profiles of people who turn out to be unavailable.
The person you hired stays on your project. If they genuinely have to change, you get notice, an overlap and a handover — not a new name on the invoice.
They commit to your repository, work your tickets and attend your standup. Nothing is developed behind a wall and delivered as a zip.
Documentation and handover notes are part of the work, not a favour at the end. What the developer learns about your system does not leave when they do.
These are the people, not a sample of a pool. You interview whoever you would be working with, and the person you interview is the person who does the work.

Full Stack Developer — Mobile
Cross-platform apps that reach both stores from one codebase, and the APIs behind them.

Full Stack Developer — PHP & Laravel
Laravel backends and the database design underneath them, with React on the front.

Full Stack Developer — iOS
Native iOS where the platform matters, cross-platform where it does not, plus the Node services behind both.
One developer, your project only, your working hours. The straightforward arrangement when you have a quarter or more of work and want someone who learns your system properly.
Two to five developers alongside your own team, with a lead who runs the day to day so your manager is not managing five extra people.
Where a full month is more than you need: a specialist for two or three days a week, or a short engagement to get a specific piece over the line.
The stack, the stage, the team they would join and what the first month needs to produce. This is what tells us whether we have the right person, or whether we should say no.
Profiles with real project history, then a technical call with each. You are choosing a colleague, so you should hear them reason about a problem rather than read a CV.
Two weeks on a real ticket, billed. If it is not working you stop there and owe nothing further — which is a cheaper way to find out than three months in.
Hours and overlap with your timezone, which standup, which board, who reviews the code, and how escalation works. Written down, because assumptions here are what sour these arrangements.
Your repository, your review rules, your definition of done. We do not run a parallel process and reconcile at the end of a sprint.
A short review of output, blockers and fit, with the option to scale up, scale down or stop on thirty days. No annual lock-in.
The complaint about hired developers is nearly always the same, and it is not about skill. It is that the person on the call was not the person who did the work, that they disappeared into a separate process and delivered something nobody could review, and that when they left they took everything they had learned with them.
So we sell it the other way round. You meet the actual developer and interview them. They work in your repository against your tickets. The engagement runs on thirty days' notice with a paid two-week trial first, because an arrangement that has to be locked in for a year is usually one that could not survive being optional.
No substitution without notice, an overlap and a handover. This is the single most common failure in this market and it is entirely avoidable.
Your repo, your review rules, your board. Work developed out of sight and delivered in a bundle cannot be reviewed, only accepted.
Handover notes and README updates are part of the ticket. What they learn about your system belongs to you, not to them.
Clients increasingly want two paid weeks before committing a quarter, and they are right to. We would rather find out early too.
Four hours of genuine overlap with your working day is worth more than any promise about availability. It is the first thing we agree and it goes in writing.
Code assistants have made average output faster and made review more important, not less. Judgement about what to build is what you are hiring, and that has not been automated.
IP assignment, repository ownership and what happens to credentials at the end are now standard questions at the start. They should be, and we answer them in the contract rather than at the exit.
A full-time dedicated developer from Techtaru Digital typically runs ₹75,000–2.2 lakh per month depending on experience and stack, billed monthly with thirty days' notice. Part-time and specialist arrangements are priced on the weekly hours. There is no recruitment fee and no annual commitment.
Let’s talk about your hire developers project. No obligation, just a conversation.
Next service
Node.js Development